Swatch Group accoglie con favore la sentenza del tribunale britannico contro Samsung

Swatch Group
Swatch Group

Questa notizia non è disponibile in italiano. Voglia consultare la versione inglese (qui di seguito).


Swatch Group today won a milestone trade mark case against Samsung in the UK.  Last year, Mrs Justice Falk held that Samsung had infringed trade marks belonging to a number of well-known Swiss watch brands of the Swatch Group including amongst others Omega, Tissot, Longines and Swatch. Today, in the Court of Appeal in London, in a case which will have a significant impact on internet trade mark law, Lord Justice Arnold, Lord Justice Lewison and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing comprehensively rejected Samsung’s appeal.

The Appeal Court confirmed the trial judge’s ruling, that certain downloadable “watch face” apps available on Samsung’s Galaxy App store, which could be installed onto its smartwatches, infringed the trade marks of companies of the Swatch Group. The infringements included such famous trade marks of Swiss watch-making as Breguet, Blancpain, Jacquet Droz, Glashütte Original, Omega, Longines, Tissot, Hamilton, Mido, and Swatch.

The widest impact of the case is likely to come from its treatment of the “e-Commerce Directive” defences. Samsung argued that it had a defence to a claim for damages, because the watch face apps had been supplied by third party developers through its online Galaxy App store.  At trial, the judge rejected Samsung’s defence of “mere hosting” (Art. 14 of the E-Commerce Directive) on the basis of the knowledge test in Article 14(1), saying: “the test is one of whether a diligent economic operator should have identified the illegality by reference to facts or circumstances of which it is (actually) aware. The existence of notice and take-down procedures does not itself provide a defence.” The Court of Appeal went on to hold that Samsung could not rely on Art. 14 at all, because: “Samsung’s acts of use of the disputed signs were active, and gave it knowledge of and control over that content. They were not merely technical, automatic and passive with no knowledge or control. Thus they were not within Article 14(1).”

Mireille Koenig, the Swatch Group co-Chief Legal Officer (CLO) and member of the Extended Group Management Board, said: “Swatch Group is pleased with the judgment, which looked at a new form of trade mark infringement in the digital age, and the liability of online providers such as Samsung’s Galaxy Store. The Court reached the right result, protecting the exclusivity and value of our iconic watch brands.”

 

Notizie correlate

Swatch Group: Cifre principali 2023
AD HOC

Swatch Group: Cifre principali 2023

Fatturato netto in aumento del 12.6% a tassi di cambio costanti, rispettivamente del 5.2% ai tassi di cambio attuali, a CHF 7 888 milioni. Crescita delle vendite di oltre l’8% nel quarto trimestre in valute locali. Nonostante un effetto valutario estremamente negativo, il segmento Orologi & Gioielli (Produzione compresa) ha conseguito un…

Acquisizione di un edificio in New Bond Street a Londra

Acquisizione di un edificio in New Bond Street a Londra

Swatch Group ha appena acquisito un bene immobiliare di prestigio in una delle vie più lussuose di Londra. L’edificio, situato al numero 171 di New Bond Street, ospita dal 2006 un Salon del marchio internazionale di lusso Harry Winston, che appartiene al Gruppo. La transazione ammonta a circa CHF 90 milioni. L’edificio, costruito nel 1856, dispone…

Rapporto semestrale 2023
AD HOC

Rapporto semestrale 2023

Fatturato netto di CHF 4 019 milioni, +18.0% rispetto all’esercizio precedente, a corsi di cambio costanti (+11.3% ai corsi attuali), nonostante un effetto valutario estremamente negativo di CHF -242 milioni.  Il fatturato netto ha superato il precedente semestre record del 2018 dell’+8.5%, a corsi di cambio costanti. Crescita a due…